Removed Git worktree directoryPublic

Planning PR data retrieval

I'm setting up to fetch comprehensive PR details—title, body, comments, commits, files, author, labels—using gh pr view and gh pr diff, plus scanning for linked issues to retrieve via gh issue view. I'll also read the main branch files fully without using sed or cat.

Fetching PR diff

Planning full file reads for relevant code

I identified that no issues are referenced in commits or comments, so I'll focus on reading full relevant files from the main branch without truncation. I'll prioritize runner.ts, interactive-mode.ts, extensions-runner.test.ts, and keybindings.ts to understand the behavior and verify against diffs, also checking related files like extension runner usage and extension registration as needed.

Planning thorough PR and changelog reads

I'll read the entire changelog file without truncation to check the Unreleased section and other entries. For the PR, I'll retrieve full details including description, comments, commits, review comments, and timeline events using a comprehensive PR view command to ensure I capture all relevant context.

Clarifying review data usage

Noting that review comments aren't separate; reviews field holds the needed data, so I'll fetch reviews accordingly.

Confirming issue closing references

Noted to use the closingIssuesReferences field for linking issue closures in commits.

Preparing to read updated main branch files

Preparing to import keybindings

I'm reading the entire keybindings.ts file to properly import keybindings in the diff.

Preparing for full interactive mode

Reconciling file read limits

The read tool truncates files at 50KB or 2000 lines despite instructions to read files fully without offset; to get the complete file, multiple reads with offsets will be necessary even though this slightly conflicts with the ideal of reading "in full" at once.

Confirming multipart reads with offset

The instructions conflict but the tool guidance to use offset/limit for large files takes priority here; I'll read large files in multiple segments using offset to fully retrieve content despite initial "no offset" advice for full reads.

Preparing to read full test file

Planning code and test comparison

Noting the current file is outdated compared to the diff with test updates; I’ll examine interactive-mode fully and related code paths like keybindings manager and extension runner to validate behavior, plus review the changelog for packages/coding-agent.

Planning doc search for keybindings

I'm preparing to search docs (extensions.md and README) for mentions of keybindings or shortcuts to check if any updates are needed related to reserved keybindings in the extension.

Planning targeted docs and code reads

I'm identifying key docs sections on registerShortcut and reserved keybindings for focused reading, while planning to read relevant code files from main branch in full as required. I'll also review interactive-mode's getShortcuts and related test diffs to track signature changes and keybinding hints.

Identifying changelog gap and doc inspection plan

I found no changelog entry for this coding-agent behavioral change, so I'll report it as missing and propose a "Fixed" entry crediting the external author. I'll also check README sections around registerShortcut and reserved shortcuts for necessary doc updates by searching and reading relevant snippets.

Planning chunked file reading

I'm preparing to read around line 1110 by using an offset of 1090 and a limit of 80 lines to capture the needed code context.

Checking documentation for reserved shortcuts

I'm searching the docs, especially around the shortcut registration calls, to see if reserved keybindings are already documented and whether the README needs updating.

Assessing keybinding changes and docs impact

Noticing reserved keybindings are now clearly separated from overridable ones, with a warning added on conflicts; this likely warrants at least a mention in docs, especially for registerShortcut. I'll verify all getShortcuts usages reflect signature changes and confirm no regressions by searching across files.

Clarifying reserved actions versus editor actions

I'm verifying that the new reserved action list mixes editor and app actions like "copy" and "submit," so I'll check the pi-tui package for the exact EditorAction and AppAction definitions to ensure these are correctly classified and handled.

Locating editor action definitions

I'm searching in the packages/tui directory to find the file defining EditorAction and editor keybindings to understand their structure and usage.

Analyzing reserved actions update

The reserved actions list now explicitly blocks overrides for common editor commands like "copy" and "deleteToLineEnd," likely to prevent extensions from interfering with core behavior. This affects how built-in keybindings map keys to actions with restrictOverride flags, potentially causing conflicts (e.g., "ctrl+c" mapped to both "clear" and "copy") that need careful handling.

Examining keybinding override order and conflicts

The final built-in keybinding for a key is determined by iteration order over editor then app actions, causing later app actions to overwrite earlier editor ones even if reserved. This can lead to reserved actions being potentially bypassed if a non-reserved action later overwrites the same key, possibly allowing extensions to override keys still used by reserved actions—highlighting a subtle risk in conflict detection logic. Next, I’ll check how extension shortcuts integrate and whether built-in handlers block extension shortcuts at runtime.

Planning full read of custom-editor.ts

Clarifying extension shortcut precedence and conflict handling

Extension shortcuts are checked first and override built-in actions, making conflict detection crucial. The code restricts extensions from using reserved action keys based on current user keybindings, but extensions can override non-reserved built-in actions with a warning since onExtensionShortcut runs before built-in handlers.

Analyzing potential conflicts in effective keybinding mapping

The current buildBuiltinKeybindings mapping only records the last action for each key, risking that non-reserved actions later in the order overwrite reserved ones and allow extensions to override critical shortcuts inadvertently. Also, unbinding reserved actions by empty keys could let extensions reuse those keys, which might be intentional but deserves caution. The key normalization approach looks consistent but warrants verification against key matching utilities to ensure case-insensitivity.

Confirming keyId case normalization

I verified that keyIds are consistently lowercased in parsing and matching, so keys like "pageUp" become "pageup" for comparison, aligning with how built-in keybindings are handled. The reserved actions list now includes "copy," ensuring conflicts like ctrl+c are properly reserved.

Analyzing reserved actions and extension shortcut conflicts

The reserved actions list now includes more editor and app actions like "copy" and "deleteToLineEnd," ensuring keys like ctrl+c remain reserved even if remapped, preventing extension overrides. However, a subtle bug exists where user keybindings with non-reserved actions can override reserved actions by order, allowing extensions to override keys intended for reserved actions, which aligns with honoring user remaps but may cause conflicts. Tests cover these cases, confirming warnings for non-reserved conflicts and blocks for reserved ones; overall the system respects user intent while guarding core reserved shortcuts.

Checking public API impact of method signature change

I'm verifying if the changed method in the exported ExtensionRunner class is part of the public API, which could make the signature change breaking; initial exploration suggests it may be internal but potentially accessible externally.

Assessing potential API-breaking change

The method signature change on an exported class method could break typed external usage despite lacking documentation; this suggests a breaking change that should be noted in the changelog.

Identifying multiple review points on keybinding changes

The signature change on the exported method risks breaking external typed usage and needs a changelog entry; docs may require updates about extension shortcut conflicts reflecting user keybindings. Also, the reserved actions logic tied to current keybindings may imperfectly handle overlapping keys, suggesting a possible edge case to highlight in review. Tests cover new behavior, but running them isn’t confirmed.

Summarizing detailed PR review points

The review highlights a breaking signature change on the exported method requiring changelog attention, notes missing documentation for new action-based keybinding conflicts and reserved actions, and confirms added tests covering new behavior though not run. It also raises questions about whether to document the API break explicitly and update extension shortcut docs.

Preparing to read skill file

Requesting file and line details

I'm asking the user to specify which file and line they want to open in VSCode before proceeding.

Planning to locate function and open in VSCode

I'm preparing to find the line number of getShortcuts by running ripgrep with line numbers, then open that file at the correct line in VSCode using code -g path:line.

Preparing to open file at line

I'm planning to open a specific file in VS Code at a particular line using the code -g path:line command in bash.

Explaining effective keybindings usage

The new code uses effective keybindings to filter reserved shortcuts and warn about built-in conflicts by checking against the user's current keybindings. The getShortcuts function now requires these to build an accurate map of built-in keys, because without this input it cannot detect which keys the user has overridden. To provide this information, you can pass the effective configuration from the KeybindingsManager when running interactively or allow a default parameter in the runner. This approach ensures proper conflict detection and warning behavior.

Analyzing extension runner changes

The diff introduces reserved actions now centralized in the keybindings module, overlapping with existing keybindings duplicates, suggesting possible simplification by unifying these lists and relying more on KeybindingsManager. Key normalization to lowercase is an explicit design choice, improving consistency. The update adds warnings for extensions overriding non-reserved built-in actions. This risks breaking code using ExtensionRunner’s public getShortcuts method but should not affect typical extensions. Reserved actions include common editor commands like "copy" and "selectConfirm," reflecting deliberate integration with keybindings concepts.

Summarizing keybindings and extension runner changes

The updated getShortcuts requires effective keybindings to identify current built-in bindings and detect freed keys, making the argument necessary. Simplification opportunities include computing reserved key sets once, passing a KeybindingsManager or precomputed map to ExtensionRunner at initialization, or providing an optional parameter with a default to maintain compatibility. Other design choices are normalizing keys to lowercase, maintaining a reserved action list that now covers app and editor actions, and warning extensions when overriding non-reserved built-ins, while allowing the extension binding to take precedence. This introduces stricter blocking of keys bound to reserved actions, reflecting user overrides in effective config. Typical extensions remain unaffected, but SDK consumers using getShortcuts directly face a breaking API change due to the new required argument.

Recommending merge with minor notes

This is good to merge with a minor suggestion: no documentation changes are needed. The optional argument can be removed since it's not required, but the user isn't concerned about the SDK. The only requirement is adding a changelog entry. It may be worth adjusting tests accordingly. Do NOT start implementing changes unless asked.

Confirming full changelog read needed

The changelog file exceeds 50KB and previous reads were truncated, so I must reread it fully without limits before editing to comply with the rule.

Planning segmented changelog reads

The changelog exceeds the tool's 50KB limit, so I'll read it in multiple sequential segments using offsets to cover the entire file before editing, satisfying the full-read requirement despite the partial-read rule. I'll then update the Unreleased Fixed section per the PR details.

Continuing code reading

Confirming full file coverage

I verified the file was read earlier in full and now with offsets, so the full content is covered. Next, I'll update the changelog's Unreleased Fixed section, ensuring I re-read the top part for exact context before editing.

Reading top portion for context

I'll read the file's top lines with offset and limit to precisely locate the Unreleased section, since this partial read aligns with the rules after having read the full file earlier.

Inserting new fixed bullet under Unreleased

I'm preparing to add a new bullet under the Fixed section for Unreleased, accurately formatting the entry to note a fix for extension shortcut conflict detection with proper PR and author links.

Adding focus propagation fix bullet

I'm adding a bullet noting that components with search inputs now correctly propagate focus state for cursor positioning, linked to issue #827.