Identified missing session directory error.
UnderstandRemoved problematic prompt and updated startup prompt.
EditValidated changes with tests and checks.
VerifyCommitted and pushed the fix.
Cleanupi just ran this
➜ pi-session-redactor git:(main) ✗ pi --session ./pi-sessions/redacted/2026-01-16T02-23-12-010Z_d7892a86-ae30-4b5d-8bbd-06b3afaba4a0.jsonl node:internal/bootstrap/switches/does_own_process_state:128 rawMethods.chdir(directory); ^
Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, chdir '/Users/badlogic/workspaces/pi-session-redactor' -> '/Users/user/workspaces/pi-mono' at wrappedChdir (node:internal/bootstrap/switches/does_own_process_state:128:14) at process.chdir (node:internal/worker:116:5) at process.chdir (/opt/homebrew/lib/node_modules/@mariozechner/pi-coding-agent/node_modules/graceful-fs/polyfills.js:22:11) at createAgentSessionRuntime (file:///opt/homebrew/lib/node_modules/@mariozechner/pi-coding-agent/dist/core/agent-session-runtime.js:227:17) at async main (file:///opt/homebrew/lib/node_modules/@mariozechner/pi-coding-agent/dist/main.js:442:21) { errno: -2, code: 'ENOENT', syscall: 'chdir', path: '/Users/badlogic/workspaces/pi-session-redactor', dest: '/Users/user/workspaces/pi-mono' }
Node.js v25.2.1
wtf is happening
>rg -n "createAgentSessionRuntime|--session|process\.chdir|chdir\(" packages/coding-agent src . -g '!node_modules'Searching for targeted insights
I'm thinking I might need to conduct a more focused search, possibly by reviewing a relevant file in full. This could help me inspect the packages or coding agent files that are relevant to my current task. I'll look into session working directory (cwd) and use session metadata, employing tools like rg for cwd and creating an Agent Session Runtime. It’s all about getting that information sorted clearly!
>rg -n "createAgentSessionRuntime|session.*cwd|cwd|working directory|process\.cwd\(|process\.chdir\(|session file|sessionPath" packages/coding-agent -g '!**/dist/**'Inspecting source files
I’m thinking I need to examine the actual source code instead of just relying on the README. It might be enough to deduce that the session file stores the current working directory (cwd) and runtime context for changing directories. I'll probably have to search more effectively, perhaps looking in the dist or src folders. It seems like the "createAgentSessionRuntime" might be located in the current source, so I plan to use "rg" with the exact name.
>rg -n "createAgentSessionRuntime|workingDirectory|cwd|process\.chdir|restore.*cwd|session.*directory|--session" packages/coding-agent/src packages/coding-agent/docs -g '!**/dist/**'>rg -n '"cwd"|workingDirectory|process\.cwd\(' pi-sessions/redacted/2026-01-16T02-23-12-010Z_d7892a86-ae30-4b5d-8bbd-06b3afaba4a0.jsonlInvestigating session header paths
I need to find the session header path. The stack trace destination points to '/Users/user/workspaces/pi-mono', while the original current directory is '/Users/badlogic/workspaces/pi-session-redactor'. Now, if I'm trying to change the directory to the destination, I see a Node error. It seems the current working directory from the session header might not exist, especially since the user is trying to use sessions from a different project. I should look into the session format in the documentation.
>rg -n 'type:\s*"session"|cwd:' packages/coding-agent/src/core/session-manager.ts packages/coding-agent/docs/session.mdExplaining possible causes
I'm trying to explain the likely cause of an issue and explore options. If someone is using redacted sessions from another machine, it can mess with the current directory. If that path is invalid, it could cause a crash.
I might mention the use of --fork and how it relates to copying the session header. The --session parameter could be an issue if it resolves an incorrect path, leading to Node throwing an error before any proper handling occurs. Suggesting the --fork option could be helpful!
Analyzing session path issues
I need to clarify that without prompting to fork, an explicit path can bypass the global prompt, leading directly to the session. When the runtime changes to the session's current directory, it might crash if the file's cwd comes from a different machine.
I should mention how SessionManager.open() reads the header and uses that cwd, which might not exist on the current machine. A couple of potential fixes could include editing the cwd in the JSONL file for temporary inspection or considering the session import/fork mechanism.
Exploring the --fork option
I’m considering the --fork <path> option. If the header cwd is invalid, then forkFrom can load entries without requiring a cwd. It reads the source entries but doesn't change the cwd since it writes a new header with the target cwd instead.
In the createSessionManager, for the --fork path, or local/global settings, it returns forkSessionOrExit(sourcePath, cwd), which uses the current cwd as the target. This helps avoid crashes related to invalid paths!
Pi is restoring the session's original cwd from the JSONL header, then chdiring into it.
What happened:
pi from:
/Users/badlogic/workspaces/pi-session-redactorcwd: "/Users/user/workspaces/pi-mono"SessionManager.open(...) reads the session header and takes header.cwdcreateAgentSessionRuntime(...) calls process.chdir(sessionCwd)/Users/badlogic/workspaces/pi-session-redactor/Users/user/workspaces/pi-monoENOENTSo the key point is this:
--session does not mean "open this file but stay in my current directory".
It means "open this session and restore its original working directory".
Why this is especially likely here:
pi-sessions/redacted/.../Users/user/...Relevant code paths in packages/coding-agent:
src/core/session-manager.ts
SessionManager.open() reads header.cwdsrc/core/agent-session-runtime.ts
createAgentSessionRuntime() does process.chdir(result.services.cwd)So yes, the behavior is real, not your shell being weird.
Practical workarounds:
cwd to a real local path.--fork <session-file> from the directory you want. Forking rewrites the session header to the current cwd.What looks wrong in pi itself:
--session loadsIf you want, I can point you at the exact patch to make pi handle this gracefully.
Node.js v25.2.1 ➜ pi-session-redactor git:(main) ✗ pi --fork --session ./pi-sessions/redacted/2026-01-16T02-23-12-010Z_d7892a86-ae30-4b5d-8bbd-06b3afaba4a0.jsonl No session found matching '--session'
Clarifying CLI Flags Usage
I need to focus on discussing usage rather than implementation unless asked directly. It's important to explain the misuse of command-line interface flags. I should inspect whether parseArgs supports the --fork flag, which expects an argument rather than a boolean, and cannot be combined with --session. I should also mention the correct syntax, like pi --fork ./path, and explain what happens if the session path is not found. Let’s keep it concise and technical.
You invoked it wrong.
--fork takes an argument. It is not a boolean flag.
So this:
pi --fork --session ./pi-sessions/redacted/2026-01-16T02-23-12-010Z_d7892a86-ae30-4b5d-8bbd-06b3afaba4a0.jsonlgets parsed as:
--fork argument = --session--sessionNo session found matching '--session'Also, --fork and --session are mutually exclusive.
Use this instead, from the directory you want as the new cwd:
pi --fork ./pi-sessions/redacted/2026-01-16T02-23-12-010Z_d7892a86-ae30-4b5d-8bbd-06b3afaba4a0.jsonlWhat that should do:
/Users/user/workspaces/pi-mono chdirSo the two errors were different:
--session <file>
--fork --session <file>
--session got consumed as the argument to --forkIf pi --fork ./pi-sessions/redacted/...jsonl still fails, paste that output.
it shouldn't hard crash, i think it should show a simple tui that warns that the cwd doesn't exist, and whether the user wants to run in current cwd. but only for interactive mode. in print/json/rpc mode we probably want to error hard, but under our control.
Planning technical response
I see that I need to summarize the user’s suggestion without jumping into implementation unless they ask for it. I'll aim for a concise summary of the technical design and hopefully align with their expectations. It might be useful to mention the difference between interactive and non-interactive behavior while keeping it manageable. I also want to propose an expected flow along with some edge cases to consider. Let’s focus on crafting a clear, direct response!
Agreed.
Current behavior is wrong in two ways:
chdir path instead of a controlled pi errorYour proposed split makes sense:
If session header cwd does not exist:
process.chdir() yet<missing-cwd><process.cwd()>?Fail deterministically with a pi-managed error, for example:
Interactive mode can ask the user to resolve ambiguity. Non-interactive modes cannot safely guess, especially RPC.
The fix probably belongs before the runtime does process.chdir():
sessionManager.getCwd()--session currently means "resume this exact session", including its stored cwd semantics.
If interactive mode falls back to current cwd, it should be explicit to the user that this changes path resolution, context discovery, settings, and project-local resources.
So yes, this should be fixed, and your mode split is the right behavior. If you want, I can turn this into a concrete issue description or patch plan.
i want you to implement this
Planning file modifications
I need to fully read the relevant files before making any edits. It seems like my first message should clearly define the task. I need to modify the code, and likely the files I'll deal with are main.ts and core/agent-session-runtime.ts. I should inspect the arguments and modes, and maybe create a simple warning TUI using something like promptConfirm. The user requested a minimal TUI for warnings, so I need to explore what confirmation components we already have. Let's inspect the architecture.
>rg -n "warning|confirm|missing cwd|cwd does not exist|show.*warning|show.*error|promptConfirm|Session found in different project|modal|dialog|confirm" packages/coding-agent/src -g '!**/dist/**'>rg -n "setCwd|override.*cwd|getCwd\(|constructor\(cwd|new SessionManager\(" packages/coding-agent/src/core/session-manager.ts packages/coding-agent/src -g '!**/dist/**'Exploring TUI implementation
I’m considering whether I can instantiate a simple TUI (Text User Interface) using ProcessTerminal to display text. I think I need to understand the keyboard handling API better, maybe even search for examples or small components that can help. It seems like there’s a lot to explore in making this work, but I'm focused on finding the right details to get started. Let's see what I can find!
>rg -n "new TUI\(|setFocus\(|on\(\"data\"|matchesKey\(|tui.select.confirm|keyHint\(" packages/coding-agent/src/modes/interactive/components packages/coding-agent/src/modes/interactive -g '!**/dist/**' | head -n 80Considering a simple TUI implementation
I'm thinking about creating a tiny new file that might be simpler. Using getKeybindings could work, but the user explicitly wants a simple TUI. So, it might be better to implement it with pi-tui in a minimal way. I can create a helper in main.ts using TUI components, though I need to add some imports. I’m also weighing whether to use raw input without keybindings since keeping things simple should be the priority. But I do want to ensure a good UI layout for the user!
Exploring TUI component options
I'm considering using components like TUI, ProcessTerminal, Container, Text, and Spacer, and maybe also getKeybindings. I need to check how focusable inputs work, and I might implement a new component that extends Container with a handleInput method, which should cover the need. I'm curious about whether handleInput is called when focused, and searching for the Focusable interface might help. I think some components, though not implementing Focusable, still have handleInput. I could create a new file for MissingCwdPrompt, but the user didn’t ask for diffs. Maybe a minimal component in main.ts would suffice?
Considering imports and modifications
I'm thinking about importing directly in main.ts to bring in the interactive component from the CLI main. That could work fine, but I need to consider whether I need to read a file for the new component. It seems like I only need to modify main.ts, although if I add a helper, I might have to adjust session-manager too. Also, I should detect any missing current working directory, and I might need to create a controlled error type for that!
Considering error handling
I think it might be easier to implement error handling in JSON format. If the app mode is set to "json", I could log the error using console.log, specifically formatting it to show the error code and relevant messages. I need to check the documentation to see if there's a specific format for JSON or if the event stream has similar "type: error" messages. It seems like a good idea to verify this before proceeding.
>rg -n "SessionManager\.open\(|createSessionManager\(|main\(|resolveAppMode|buildSessionOptions|runPrintMode|missing cwd|cwd does not exist" packages/coding-agent/test packages/coding-agent/src -g '!**/dist/**'>find packages/coding-agent/test -maxdepth 3 -type f | sortConsidering TUI integration
I'm thinking about how to add the export for the helper feature. It might make sense to implement a prompt that aligns with the current theme from the startupSettingsManager. While I could use promptConfirm with readline for non-TTY environments, the user specifically requested a simple TUI. So, I should prioritize that. I need to figure out how to integrate the TUI prompt before runtime and look into using TUI from pi-tui, specifically checking for stop() usage to manage the terminal properly.
>rg -n "\.stop\(\)|ui\.stop\(|stop\(\): void" packages/coding-agent/src packages/coding-agent/test -g '!**/dist/**' | head -n 50Investigating API needs
I might need the API for TUI.stop, so I’m considering whether to search in node_modules. But I think I can infer what I need. I’ll inspect its use in interactive mode, focusing on stop(): void, particularly around line 1800. This should give me a clearer idea of how to proceed. Let's dive into that and see if I can figure things out from there!
>rg -n "stop\(\): void|shutdown\(|this\.ui\.stop\(" packages/coding-agent/src/modes/interactive/interactive-mode.tsConsidering keybindings and functions
I'm thinking about whether to use a special startup prompt outside the main app. It might be fine, but I believe needing configuration is important. I should double-check the keybindings manager if I'm not modifying anything. It could help to read the partial docs or search for export names using bash's rg. I'll explore that further to ensure I'm on the right track!
Designing a helper file
I’m looking at a helper file that involves checking for session files and current directories. If a session file doesn’t exist, I won’t need to check the current working directory, but if it does, I should validate it. If the current path exists, there’s no problem. I also want to consider if I'm dealing with in-memory sessions or new files, and maybe include the term storedSessionCwd for clarity. It feels like I’m covering all bases!
Setting up main.ts
In main.ts, I’m considering whether or not to import something if the helper function already takes care of it. Once I create the session manager, I’ll check for any missing session current working directories using getMissingSessionCwdIssue. If there’s an issue and the app is in interactive mode, I should prompt the user for confirmation about whether to continue. If they choose not to, I’ll stop the theme watcher and restore standard output. Maybe I should also think about handling exit codes more gracefully.
>rg -n "handleResumeSession|switchSession\(|importFromJsonl\(|resume" packages/coding-agent/src/modes/interactive/interactive-mode.ts packages/coding-agent/src/core/agent-session-runtime.ts>rg -n "switch_session|importFromJsonl|runtimeHost\.switchSession|runtimeHost\.importFromJsonl|catch \(error" packages/coding-agent/src/modes/rpc -g '!**/dist/**'Considering custom error handling
I need to catch a custom error in RPC mode and return a success false response from the switch_session command. This seems under control and would address runtime issues during the switch_session process after startup. If --session is missing the cwd in RPC mode, the main part should handle it, while the runtime could throw a MissingSessionCwdError later. I'll need to inspect the outer catch handling in handleCommand and search lower for adjustments.
>rg -n "return error\(|catch \(err|catch \(error\)" packages/coding-agent/src/modes/rpc/rpc-mode.ts | head -n 40Considering command handling
I’m thinking about needing an outer command parser to manage errors more effectively. It might be worth exploring how to handle errors generically, perhaps looking into a "handleCommand" method that could include a catch mechanism. I want to ensure everything is running smoothly, so I’ll have to revisit that later to address potential issues. This way, I can be more prepared for any command-processing challenges that arise!
>rg -n "async function handleCommand|const handleCommand|try \{|catch \(error: unknown\)|output\(error\(" packages/coding-agent/src/modes/rpc/rpc-mode.tsConsidering implementation details
I’m thinking we should implement this in the core runtime to avoid using raw Node stack anywhere. It seems replacing it with a plain Error could be a good idea. This might streamline things and improve overall performance or clarity. I wonder how this will affect existing functionality or if there are potential edge cases we need to consider. Let's make sure we’re thorough in how we approach this to avoid any issues down the line.
>rg -n "function initTheme|export function initTheme|initTheme\(" packages/coding-agent/src/modes/interactive/theme/theme.tsClarifying stored cwd usage
I could mention that the stored cwd (current working directory) is utilized for project settings, AGENTS.md discovery, and setting relative tool paths. That sounds nice and makes it clear why it's important to have the cwd correctly set. It helps in organizing everything better and ensuring that tools can find what they need to operate smoothly. Overall, I think it's a helpful addition.
Planning reading strategy
I need to read the remainder of the document, specifically from 1444 to 3789 and 4120 to the end. I've already tackled sections 1-1443 and 3790-4450, but maybe not all of those. To ensure I get the full picture, it might make sense to read those chunks sequentially: first 1444-3789 and then 4451 to the end. Okay, let's go with that plan!
Considering session switches
I'm thinking about the call sequence for session switching. It seems that emitBeforeSwitch gets triggered even before teardown, which isn't ideal. Then, it runs again on the second call. I wonder if extensions might see those duplicate session_before_switch events. Maybe it would be better if runtimeHost.switchSession could detect the issue itself before emitBeforeSwitch is called? After all, it currently emits this signal before opening a new session.
>rg -n "createAgentSessionRuntime\(|AgentSessionRuntime" packages/coding-agent/test -g '!**/dist/**'Evaluating test strategies
I’m considering whether to add tests to the runtime-events file or create a new file, which seems easier. I might skip TUI prompt tests. One idea is to implement a unit test for switchSession with a missing cwd that triggers a MissingSessionCwdError, while a cwdOverride should work. I think I should set up a new test file to exercise runtime logic using a helper. I may also test the getMissingSessionCwdIssue if it’s simple, but a runtime test sounds adequate.
Planning session tests
I need to determine if runtimeHost's current session points to the tempDir. I’m thinking about creating a missing session file in the same or a separate session directory. We’d write a JSONL file with only the header, and SessionManager.open would handle loading entries and sessionId. Once the session context is built with runtimeHost.switchSession, it should function well, but I need an existing current session for switching.
I’m outlining a pseudo test to check for a controlled error when the session cwd is missing, including an override option. I need to be sure that the session file uses an absolute path after switching.
Crafting edits carefully
I'm planning to make edits thoughtfully. I could either write new files or edit existing ones. Specifically, I need to focus on creating new files like core/session-cwd.ts and cli/missing-session-cwd-prompt.ts. This approach will help ensure that everything is organized and functional. I want to make sure I handle the implementation efficiently. Let’s take it step by step!
Considering modifications
I’m thinking about making some modifications to the agent-session-runtime. I might need to add some imports and new methods. I want to craft these changes carefully to ensure everything works well together. There's a lot to consider in terms of functionality and compatibility. I’m curious if there are specific features or improvements that I should prioritize during this process. Let’s dive in and make it as effective as possible!
why do we have to modify session manager with overrideCwd?
Because SessionManager.open() is the point where pi turns a session file into runtime state.
Right now that method does this:
header.cwdEverything downstream uses sessionManager.getCwd():
For the fallback behavior, we need:
An override on SessionManager.open() is the smallest place to express that.
Without it, the alternatives are worse:
setCwd() mutator to SessionManageropen() logic somewhere elseSo the override is not about session persistence. It is about creating an in-memory SessionManager from an existing file while substituting the effective cwd.
If you want, I can switch it to a separate factory instead, for example:
SessionManager.open(path, sessionDir?)SessionManager.openWithCwd(path, cwd, sessionDir?)That is a bit clearer than adding a third optional parameter.
i thought we let sessionmanager open (reads header, or uses process.cwd), then main detects cwd doesn't exist, prompts users, if users says yes, we keep session manager as is, but we instantiate services with the current cwd. no?
Not safely with the current architecture.
What you describe would mean:
SessionManager.cwd = stored session cwd from headerservices.cwd = current cwd fallback chosen by userThat sounds nice, but pi currently assumes those are the same thing in a lot of places.
Problems if they diverge:
InteractiveMode uses this.sessionManager.getCwd() for:
/resume local session listingSessionManager.newSession() and branching/forking use this.cwd when writing new headersSo yes, main can detect the missing cwd and prompt the user. But after the user says yes, we still need one coherent effective cwd object graph for that session runtime.
That means one of these has to happen:
Option 2 is architecturally cleaner, but much larger.
Option 1 is why I added the override. It does not rewrite the file. It only says:
So the override is not to change persistence semantics. It is to keep the runtime internally coherent.
That said, I agree the current API shape is ugly. A third optional arg on open() is not ideal.
Better options:
SessionManager.openWithCwd(path, cwd, sessionDir?)SessionManager.open(path, { sessionDir, cwdOverride })That would make the intent explicit.
So the short answer is:
SessionManager on the old cwd while services use a different cwdoverrideCwd parameter on open()If you want, I’ll rework the partial change into SessionManager.openWithCwd(...) instead.
ok, then let's
Considering session management
I need to make sure the guard check throws a MissingSessionCwdError before calling process.chdir. This way, I can maintain better control even when we move outside of startup detection, like during switch_session or import actions. It's crucial to have this error management in place to avoid any unexpected issues, so I think I'm on the right track with this approach! Let’s keep refining it for better robustness.
Checking code changes
I need to remember that after I modify code, it's important to run "npm run check" to see the full output. If I create or modify a test file, I must also run that specific test to ensure everything is working properly. I guess being thorough here helps catch issues early on, so I don’t miss any errors that could pop up later. Keeping things organized like this seems essential for smooth coding!
Considering file management
I'm thinking about what happens if the current working directory (cwd) is missing in an interactive session. An exception would get thrown, but the session would still remain intact, which is good. When starting up without extensions, I wonder if for importFromJsonl, we should copy the file before or after the operation. It seems we can assert on sessionManager after the copy, but if it's missing, that could cancel the import, which might leave a copy behind.
Considering TUI implementation
I’m working through the TUI prompt file options and wondering if I need to use dynamic imports for theme. Considering creating keybindings, I realize I could simplify things by using showExtensionConfirm in interactive mode instead of a separate prompt file, but startup before runtime complicates it. For runtime, maybe using /resume with showExtensionConfirm makes sense, but the user wanted something straightforward. I think having a minimal prompt for startup could still be useful!
Refining the TUI approach
I'm considering how to avoid modifying a huge file while ensuring completeness. A helper in interactive mode could render warnings using showExtensionConfirm("Session cwd not found", format...), which allows for multiline messages. This might eliminate the need for a standalone prompt. The user wants a simple TUI warning regarding the current cwd, so using this two-step prompt seems acceptable. I'll create a helper, promptForMissingSessionCwd, to manage missing cwd issues effectively. It seems like we won't need a prompt file to use keybinding!
Planning modifications
I need to import promptForMissingSessionCwd and session-cwd helpers into main.ts. In interactive-mode.ts, I'll import MissingSessionCwdError and formatMissingSessionCwdPrompt, possibly along with SessionCwdIssue. For agent-session-runtime.ts, I'll import assertSessionCwdExists. I suspect session-manager.ts might already have been modified, so I should check if createSessionManager needs to be a let instead of a const. I need to read through the full main.ts and confirm any modifications in agent-session-runtime.
Adding a helper method
I need to add a helper method, and I'm considering the best place to do it. It seems like inserting it near the showExtensionConfirm function could work well. I'll probably want to place it right after showExtensionConfirm to keep things organized. The key is to make sure it’s a unique snippet so it doesn't overlap with anything else. I'll think this through and find the best way to implement it!
Fixing handleInput method and keybindings
I need to address the handleInput method and its assigned property. I'm wondering if this will work with TypeScript’s strict settings; the container probably has a handleInput method, so the assignment should be okay. As this.handleInput comes from the base class, it might compile fine.
When dealing with keybindings, I should set them globally rather than restoring old ones. I should also ensure prompt cancel works with ctrl+c, while considering potential issues with terminal changes during ui.start().
Additionally, I think importing MissingSessionCwdError might just be for message creation.
Addressing session management and testing
I'm thinking about how to handle a missed session CWD issue when a session from another project is selected. If sessionDir is custom, I might need to open it with the selected path. For resuming sessions, it seems the createSessionManager needs to be aware of global types to support the parsed session.
I should create a test file for this, probably in packages/coding-agent/test/session-cwd.test.ts. My tests can include checking that getMissingSessionCwdIssue correctly handles undefined values, ensuring SessionManager.open uses overrides appropriately, and confirming that createAgentSessionRuntime throws an error for missing CWD during startup.
Creating temporary session files for testing
I need to create a temporary session file with a missing CWD header. It seems I could use a dummy createRuntime, but I think it should be prevented from being called during the test itself. Setting a flag might help with this. Also, I'll probably need to utilize writeFileSync from the Node.js fs module to ensure the file is created correctly. This way, I can effectively test the behavior for missing CWD.
Considering session management
I’m looking at the idea of using an override for sessions, which may involve some more work, but I'm wondering if it's sufficient. I need to create a new file with specific imports from core/session-cwd, session-manager, and agent-session-runtime. Also, createRuntime might return a rejected promise, so I think createAgentSessionRuntime should assert before calling createRuntime. I’ll need to test with the called flag as false and use tmpdir for cleanup. Let’s go ahead and write this out!
Considering test setup
I need to compile a session-cwd prompt, but first, I'll run a specific test from the package root. I might also need to look into any potential modification issues with the interactive mode. It's a lot of setup, but ensuring everything is running smoothly is important before diving into the tests. Alright, let’s get this organized and see what comes up during the test!
>cd packages/coding-agent && npx tsx ../../node_modules/vitest/dist/cli.js --run test/session-cwd.test.tsRunning checks on TypeScript
I need to run npm run check to verify things in my project. I want to ensure that the output is full and without a tail, but I'll do this without rushing. Before that, I should quickly check the TypeScript compile by running npm run check in the root directory. I just want to be careful and thorough in my approach to avoid missing anything important! So, let’s get started.
>npm run checkAddressing formatting issues
I need to fix some formatting changes in the biome, as it seems the files might have been altered. I should read the modified file to be sure it's complete. I might need to format other files as well, but let's focus on this for now. I also need to address the handleInput method. Perhaps the base Container doesn’t have this property, so I could extend it by implementing Focusable and defining the necessary handleInput method with private callbacks. I need to edit that.
Considering test reruns
I'm thinking it might not be necessary to rerun the tests since no test files were modified. But hmm, I have a new code file that hasn’t been tested yet. I definitely need to run "npm run check" again to make sure everything works, especially since Biome might have formatted four files. So, it seems like I should just go ahead and run the checks again. Better safe than sorry!
>npm run checkInspecting code changes
I'm considering whether I need to run a specific test again since the session-cwd.test already passed and hasn't changed. However, the code has changed, but not the tests, which might be okay. We did create a test file that we already ran, so that’s good. I’m thinking I should inspect the git diff and check the changed files while using git status to ensure there are no unexpected modifications from the biome.
>git status --shortSummarizing implementation details
I need to be concise while summarizing the implementation details. It's important to ensure that the new file is added and that all tests pass. I should include behavior details since the user is asking for an implementation. My final summary should focus on the key points without using an em dash. I’ll use bullets to keep things organized and make sure everything is short and to the point.
Implemented.
Files changed:
packages/coding-agent/src/main.tspackages/coding-agent/src/core/agent-session-runtime.tspackages/coding-agent/src/core/session-manager.tspackages/coding-agent/src/modes/interactive/interactive-mode.tspackages/coding-agent/src/cli/missing-session-cwd-prompt.tspackages/coding-agent/src/core/session-cwd.tspackages/coding-agent/test/session-cwd.test.tsBehavior now:
cwd is missing, pi shows a small TUI promptprint, json, and rpc exit with a controlled errorchdir crash/resume and /import:
Implementation detail:
SessionManager.open(..., cwdOverride?) is used to create a coherent runtime with a fallback cwd while keeping the same session fileValidation:
packages/coding-agent/test/session-cwd.test.ts passednpm run check passedIf you want, I can also add a small changelog entry under packages/coding-agent/CHANGELOG.md.
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Session cwd not found
Session file:
/Users/badlogic/workspaces/pi-session-redactor/pi-sessions/redacted/2026-01-16T02-23-12-010Z_d7892a86 -ae30-4b5d-8bbd-06b3afaba4a0.jsonl
Stored cwd:
/Users/user/workspaces/pi-mono
That directory does not exist on this machine.
Current cwd:
/Users/badlogic/workspaces/pi-mono
Run the session in the current cwd?
enter continue · escape/ctrl+c cancel
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
why is there so much fucking whitespace, this shouldn't be bigger than 5-6 lines
you can also use the confirm component
Considering interactive components
I'm looking into the showExtensionConfirm function in InteractiveMode since it's already using a selector, which might be causing a whitespace issue. The user has mentioned a startup prompt, likely a custom component, which raises suspicion. They suggest using a generic confirm component instead. I plan to check the extension-selector and see if there’s an existing confirm component that could potentially solve these issues. Let's explore this further!
>rg -n "Confirm|confirm component|ExtensionSelectorComponent|showExtensionConfirm|confirm" packages/coding-agent/src/modes/interactive/components packages/coding-agent/src/cli -g '!**/dist/**'the info should jus tbe "cwd from session file does not exist. continue in current cwd?"
Adjusting prompt design
I need to create a concise apology and adjust the startup prompt text to be minimal. The user explicitly mentions the desired text, so I’ll need to edit the relevant files. Since the text is already full, maybe I can simplify using an extension selector. However, the user wants just one line of info, which leads me to consider changing the custom component to a smaller format. I could also use a different component for prompts, but user preferences are key here. I'll focus on making it simpler!
Simplifying prompts
I need to simplify the formatMissingSessionCwdPrompt to just one line, making sure both the startup and interactive modes use compact text. Currently, the startup prompt has too much detail, so I can remove files and paths for clarity. The component should essentially focus on the title, message, and a key hint, limiting it to about 5-6 lines like the user wants. I could also think about using a confirm component, but perhaps not necessary right now. I'll edit the necessary files to create a cleaner interface!
Checking code changes
I’m considering whether I can eliminate the keyText import but still use it. I need to run a check to see if any tests are necessary; it seems like no new tests are needed because I’m only changing the code. I'll follow the instructions to run npm run check. Since I've written the full session-cwd.ts before, it might be enough. Still, I should read the entire file again before making any edits, just to ensure everything is correct.
>npm run checkFixed.
Changes:
Prompt text:
cwd from session file does not exist. Continue in current cwd?Updated files:
packages/coding-agent/src/core/session-cwd.tspackages/coding-agent/src/cli/missing-session-cwd-prompt.tsValidation:
npm run check passedIf you still want, I can replace the startup custom prompt with the shared selector-style confirm UI too. Right now it is compact, but still custom.
can you please output the cwd ...
Considering code changes
The user is asking for output related to the current working directory (cwd), likely wanting a concise prompt that includes it. Since they explicitly asked, it seems like they want a code modification. I'll need to read the full files before making changes, and I’ve already reviewed session-cwd.ts and `
yes, reuse as many components as we have, and rmove the @packages/coding-agent/src/cli/missing-session-cwd-prompt.ts shit. we can do this with exsiting components
Planning a function update
I’m considering creating a function in main.ts called promptForMissingSessionCwd(issue, settingsManager) that utilizes ExtensionSelectorComponent and the TUI. This way, I can make use of the existing component without needing to create an extra file, which sounds convenient! But wait, I might also need to update the test for this function—definitely don’t want to overlook that part! It seems like a manageable plan overall.
Editing TypeScript for testing
I need to run a session test and check everything. I think it would be a good idea to edit main.ts to add the necessary imports from @mariozechner/pi-tui, the extension selector, and key bindings. I want to ensure there are no inline imports to keep the code clean. Let's make these changes and see how it all comes together!
pi --fork --session ./pi-sessions/redacted/2026-01-16T02-23-12-010Z_d7892a86-ae30-4b5d-8bbd-06b3afaba4a0.jsonlpi --fork ./pi-sessions/redacted/2026-01-16T02-23-12-010Z_d7892a86-ae30-4b5d-8bbd-06b3afaba4a0.jsonl